BY CS Rasu Sharma & Praveen Singh
As we all knows that all companies whether
domestic or foreign registered under the Companies Act, 2013 are required to
file their annual financial statements and annual returns with the
jurisdictional Registrar of Companies (hereinafter referred to as the “RoC”)
in the prescribed forms and non filing of these forms construed as an offence
under the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).
RASU & ASSOCIATES
- Company Secretaries
Further, it is pertinent to mention here that Section
164(2) (a) read with 167(1) (a) of the Act provides
for disqualification of a director in case a company did not file its annual
return or a financial statement for a continuous period of three financial years.
In September 2017, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs
(Hereinafter referred to as the “MCA”) identified 3,09,614 directors
associated with the companies that had failed to file financial statements or
annual returns from 2013-14 to 2015-16. The Registrar of Companies (“RoC”), which comes under the MCA, had
disqualified directors of companies that defaulted in filing annual returns,
balance sheets and profit and loss statements in a sudden move and barred them
from accessing the online registry and till November 30, as many as 2.24 lakh
companies had been deregistered.
Thereafter, Ministry of finance directed the banks to
restrict operations of bank accounts associated with such companies. This
action of striking-off defaulting companies and blocking their bank accounts
was done with a view to combat the issue of black money and illicit fund flows,
disguised in the form of shell companies. A
list of such directors was also published on the website of MCA.
Disqualified directors were barred from sitting on
boards for five years. Several high-profile independent directors were among
those adversely affected by the move. The disqualification involved suspension
of the Director Identification Number (“DIN”) of these directors. Under
the Companies Act, 2013, only those individuals who have an active DIN can be
appointed to company boards. Once a DIN is suspended, a director cannot file
returns or any documents with the RoC. This had created an acute problem for
SMEs, many of which found all their directors disqualified.
Following
the move, concerns were raised that many directors of genuine companies have
also been disqualified. Besides, some individuals moved courts against their
disqualification. Apart from this MCA had also received
various representations, including from the industry, seeking an opportunity
for the defaulting companies to comply with the requirements while many
affected parties moved various high courts.
To provide a three-month window for defaulting companies
to submit their filings, the Ministry i.e.,
MCA come out with the “Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018”. A
move that come as an absolute relief for disqualified directors. The “Condonation of Delay Scheme” is in
force from January 1 to March 31, 2018. This is the second time that the
ministry is coming out with such a scheme after the Companies Act, 2013 came
into effect from April 1, 2014.
The MCA had earlier also launched a “Company Law Settlement Scheme 2014” providing an opportunity to
the defaulting companies to clear their defaults within the time specified therein.
The directors had been penalised after it was found that their companies had
not filed annual returns and financial statements with the RoC for three
consecutive years. Over two lakh companies had defaulted in filing their
statutory reports.
It is to be noted that Director Identification Numbers (“DINs”)
of the disqualified directors that have been de-activated would be ‘temporarily
activated’ during the scheme period. Right now it isn’t activated. To
activate the same one need to submit a letter with the Roc physically or wait
for some more time.
After submitting the filings under the scheme, a company
concerned would have to file a separate form known as Form eCODS seeking
condonation of the delay along with a fee of INR 30,000. Form eCODS can be
filed by directors who were disqualified.
Further, in case of defaulting companies whose names
have been removed /Struck off from the register and have filed applications for
revival, DINs of the directors concerned would be re-activated subject to NCLT
order and other conditions.
The main objective of this scheme is to provide an
opportunity for non-compliant, defaulting companies to rectify the default. All
defaulting companies other than those that have been struck off or removed from
the register of companies are eligible to apply for rectification of records.
[For more please read the Scheme below]
The scheme will allow defaulting companies to submit all
documents that were due for filing till June 30, 2017. A fee mentioned above will
be charged for condoning the delayed filing of the documents. Once all annual
filings and form eCODS is submitted with the RoC all the pending prosecution
for defaults in filing of annual reports and financial statements will be withdrawn
and disqualified directors will be free from all liabilities and no further
action can be taken against them.
The main text of the scheme is as follows:
MCA wide General Circular No.16/2017 dated 29th December,
2017 in exercises of powers under Sections 403, 459 and 460 of the Companies
Act, 2013 had launched “The Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018”
active from 1st January 2018 to 31st March 2018.
The COD-2018 is not applicable to companies which have
been stuck off from the register of companies under Section 248(5) of the Act
(companies who are out of business). During the validity of the scheme, the
DINs of the disqualified directors will be temporarily activated to enable them
to file the overdue documents.
Important definitions
a). Overdue
documents’ means the financial statements or the annual returns or other
associated documents, as applicable, in the case of a defaulting company and
refer to documents mentioned in paragraph 5 of the scheme.
b). Defaulting
company’ means a company which has not filed its financial statements or
annual returns as required under the Companies Act, 1956 or Companies Act,
201.3, as the case may be, and the Rules made thereunder for a continuous
period of three years.
APPLICABILITY OF THE SCHEME
As stated above, the
“Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018”
is applicable to all defaulting companies (other than the companies which have
been stuck off/whose names have been removed from the register of companies
under section 248(5) of the Act).
In the period as provided under the scheme defaulting
companies are permitted to file its overdue documents which were due for filing
till 30.06.2017.
THE CODS
SCHEME SHALL ONLY BE APPLICABLE TO BELOW MENTIONED DOCUMENTS:
Ø
Form 20B/MGT-7-
Form for filing Annual return by a company having share capital;
Ø
Form 21A/MGT-7-
Particulars of Annual return for the company not having share capital;
Ø
Form 23AC, 23ACA, 23AC-XBRL, 23ACA-XBRL, AOC-4,
AOC-4(CFS), AOC (XBRL) and AOC-4(non-XBRL)
– Forms for filing Balance Sheet/Financial Statement and profit and loss
account;
Ø
Form 66-
Form for submission of Compliance Certificate with the Registrar;
Ø
Form 23B/ADT-1-
Form for intimation for Appointment of Auditors.
PROCEDURE
TO BE FOLLOWED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SCHEME:-
After understanding the above facts the question which
will definitely comes in mind is that what should be done by the directors in
order to get rid off from their default, what procedure need to be followed by
them and how to get relief etc., The scheme specify the procedure which need to
be follow in order to file overdue documents necessary to be filed under the
scheme, The procedure is hereby enumerated for easy references:
PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE DIRECTORS TO IN ORDER TO
AVAIL BENEFIT OF CODS SCHEME
In the case of defaulting companies (The word “defaulting
company” has been defined above) whose names have not been removed from
register of companies,-
Ø
The DINs of the disqualified
directors de-activated at present shall be temporarily activated during the
validity of the scheme to enable them to file the overdue documents;
Ø
The defaulting company shall file
the overdue documents in the respective prescribed eForms paying the statutory
filing fee and additional fee payable as per section 403 of the Act read with
Companies (Registration Offices and fee) Rules, 2014 for filing these overdue
documents;
Ø
The defaulting company after filing
documents under this scheme, shall seek condonation of delay by filing form
e-CODS 2018 along with a fee of Rs. 30,000/- as prescribed under the Companies
(Registration Offices and Fee) Rules, 2014 well before the last date of the
scheme;
Ø
Disqualified Directors who have not
avail the scheme shall be continue to remain disqualified after this scheme for
a period of 5 years in terms of section 164(2) (a) read with 167(1) (a) of the
Act.
*Form eCODS will not be available for download on
the MCA Portal until 20th February 2018.
It is to be noted that in the event of defaulting
companies whose names have been removed from the register of companies under
Section 248 of the Act and which have filed applications for revival under
section 252 of the Act up to the date of this scheme, the Director’s DIN shall
be re-activated only by NCLT order of revival subject to the company having
filing of all overdue documents.
Once any Disqualified directors availed this scheme and
have filed all overdue documents, paid fee as prescribed under the Act or rules
made therein. The jurisdictional Registrar shall be duty bound to set him free
and to withdraw the prosecution(s) pending if any before the concerned Court(s)
for all documents filed under the scheme.
However, this scheme is without prejudice to action
under section 167(2) of the Act or civil and criminal liabilities, if any, of
such disqualified directors during the period they remained disqualified.
The concerned Registrar shall take all necessary actions
under the Companies Act, 1956 or 2013 against the companies who have not
availed the Scheme and continue to be in default in filing the overdue
documents.
EXTRACT OF RELEVANT
SECTIONS UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT:
Section 164. “(2) No person who is or has been
a director of a company which—
(a) has not
filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three
financial years; or
(b)....”
shall be
eligible to be re-appointed as a director of that company or appointed in other
company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company
fails to do so.
Section 167 (1) The office of a director shall
become vacant in case—
(a) he incurs
any of the disqualifications specified in section 164
.....”
(2) If a person,
functions as a director even when he knows that the office of director held by
him has become vacant on account of any of the disqualifications specified in
sub- section (1), he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to one year or with fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees
but which may extend to five lakh rupees, or with both.
Section 248 Power of Registrar to remove
name of company from register of companies
(5) At the
expiry of the time mentioned in the notice, the Registrar may, unless cause to
the contrary is shown by the company, strike off its name from the register of
companies, and shall publish notice thereof in the Official Gazette, and on the
publication in the Official Gazette of this notice, the company shall stand
dissolved.
*****
+91 97164-13016 | +91 80768-19231
mail@csrasu.com | mail.rasu.cs@gmail.com
mail@csrasu.com | mail.rasu.cs@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment